Purpose

We want to spread the awareness of the unique nature of the Pacific Northwest, where people have always blazed their own trails. We hold that it is once again time to consider our commonwealth, to speak for a sustainable future separate from the suicidal path of environmental, spiritual and societal destruction inherent in the rise of the corporate state.

September 2005
S M T W T F S
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

Search


Advanced Search

Categories

Monthly Archives

Most recent entries

Syndicate

Cascadian Links

Cascadian Bioregionalism
cascadians.tribe.net
Cascadia Daily Score
Sustainable Cascadia
Cascadia Portal
Rocky Mtn Institute
PDX Indymedia Cascadia
Pacifican Secession

Cascadian Weather

BC

Vancouver

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 43°F
  • Clouds: overcast
  • Conditions: mist

Victoria

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 46°F
  • Clouds: overcast
  • Conditions: nearby showers

WA

Bellingham

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 46°F
  • Clouds: overcast

Spokane

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 37°F
  • Clouds: overcast
  • Conditions: light rain & mist

Seattle

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 46°F
  • Clouds: overcast

Tacoma

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 46°F
  • Clouds: overcast

Olympia

  • mostly cloudy title=mostly cloudy
  • Temp: 46°F
  • Clouds: mostly cloudy

OR

Astoria

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 46°F
  • Clouds: overcast
  • Conditions: mist

Portland

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 46°F
  • Clouds: overcast
  • Conditions: mist

Pendleton

  • partly cloudy title=partly cloudy
  • Temp: 52°F
  • Clouds: partly cloudy

Eugene

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 50°F
  • Clouds: overcast
  • Conditions: light rain

Medford

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 50°F
  • Clouds: overcast

ID

Boise

  • mostly cloudy title=mostly cloudy
  • Temp: 46°F
  • Clouds: mostly cloudy

MT

Missoula

  • overcast title=overcast
  • Temp: 45°F
  • Clouds: overcast

CA

Redding

  • clear skies title=clear skies
  • Temp: 55°F
  • Clouds: clear skies

Sacramento

  • clear skies title=clear skies
  • Temp: 55°F
  • Clouds: clear skies

San Francisco

  • mostly cloudy title=mostly cloudy
  • Temp: 54°F
  • Clouds: mostly cloudy

San Jose

  • mostly cloudy title=mostly cloudy
  • Temp: 55°F
  • Clouds: mostly cloudy

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Empty Promises Are The New Black

by Will Durst

It didn’t matter how great the ovation that greeted the brooding Michael Chertoff as he expanded his line of carefully embroidered denials, or how detailed the chiseled John Roberts’ fashioned his impenetrable suit of murky conviction or how dark were wove Donald Rumsfeld’s comfortably reliable patchwork deceptions, it was abundantly obvious that everyone in the known universe (Washington) was waiting for the Big Pump to drop. That the balloons signaling the end of Fashion Week at the White House wouldn’t fall until himself, the Dubyah, unveiled his Gulf Coast rhetoric onslaught and to say Karl Rove, the creative director at House of Bush, didn’t disappoint, is akin to inferring that Karl Lagerfeld has an impish sense of humor.

Commandeering an oppressively desolate Jackson Square as a backdrop, President Bush swaggered briskly to his podium resplendent in a starched blue work shirt echoing his watery theme in the middle of a breathtakingly beautiful Big Easy night. As a dramatically staged response to critics who had heaped derision on the House’s slapdash and untailored response to Hurricane Katrina, the results were nothing less than stunning. The work shirt was a masterly touch, featuring sleeves impeccably rolled up, undoubtedly the result of one of the many master sleeve rollers Rove reportedly has on call from the fabric slums of Milan.

Introducing a new line of fresh nonsense can be an exceedingly tricky business but the Commander in Chief was up to the task as he deftly paid homage to the classic material and traditional patterns of past designers such as Johnson and Roosevelt, offering up the simple and timeless elegance of the promise of government help. He even playfully dipped into the trademarked “Emperor’s New Clothes” Family line, doling out rustic albeit purely ornamental anecdotes and one liners. From his first crooked smile to his halting farewell, this was an exercise in white space and a triumphant return of the empty but well constructed suit we’ve come to know and love during times of crisis. Liquid and pliable and fluid and inexact, the sludge coming out of his mouth cleverly matched the toxic moat surrounding the Ninth Ward. If one color stood out, it could be called ochre, auburn, burnt sienna or as it is probably referred to in the House of Bush: good ol’ brown. But not Brownie. You could see it in his speech, although his breeding and discretion kept him from describing the river of human feces that floated past former parade routes, his verbal weave was oddly reminiscent of it. Perhaps in an attempt to play off George’s Wild West heritage, Mssrs Bush and Rove consciously manufactured audio reverberations of the litterings of a bull pen, and his target audience, a group of well screened and thoroughly devoted fascistnistas, were simultaneously stunned and dazed by the audacity and humility of it all.

It was a night of fusion; a celebration of the sober alongside the frivolous and if anybody could pull off this attempt at a return to business as usual by way of ridiculous theater, it was George W Bush. Whether this season’s line can catapult his fortunes back from his last disastrous attempt is of intense interest to the House of Bush’s comrades and competitors. Has he re-ushered in a new era of nostalgic deficit spending or is the runway smoke machine set on eleven? Still your beating heart: time will tell.

Monday, September 19, 2005

Kerry's Speech at Brown University

I want to thank you for what the Brown community has done to help and comfort the many victims of Hurricane Katrina. This horrifying disaster has shown Americans at their best—and their government at its worst.

And that’s what I’ve come to talk with you about today. The incompetence of Katrina’s response is not reserved to a hurricane. There’s an enormous gap between Americans’ daily expectations and government’s daily performance. And the gap is growing between the enduring strength of the American people—their values, their spirit, their imagination, their ingenuity, and their willingness to serve and sacrifice—and the shocking weakness of the American government in contending with our country’s urgent challenges. On the Gulf Coast during the last two weeks, the depth and breadth of that gap has been exposed for all to see and we have to address it now before it is obscured again by hurricane force spin and deception.

Katrina stripped away any image of competence and exposed to all the true heart and nature of this administration. The truth is that for four and a half years, real life choices have been replaced by ideological agenda, substance replaced by spin, governance second place always to politics. Yes, they can run a good campaign—I can attest to that—but America needs more than a campaign. If 12 year-old Boy Scouts can be prepared, Americans have a right to expect the same from their 59 year-old President of the United States.

Katrina reminds us that too often the political contests of our time have been described like football games with color commentary: one team of consultants against another, red states against blue states, Democratic money against Republican money; a contest of height versus hair - sometimes. But the truth is democracy is not a game; we are living precious time each day in a different America than the one we can inhabit if we make different choices.

Today, more than ever, when the path taken last year and four years earlier takes us into a wilderness of missed opportunities—we need to keep defining the critical choices over and over, offering a direction not taken but still open in the future.

I know the President went on national television last week and accepted responsibility for Washington’s poor response to Katrina. That’s admirable. And it’s a first. As they say, the first step towards recovery is to get out of denial. But don’t hold your breath hoping acceptance of responsibility will become a habit for this administration. On the other hand, if they are up to another “accountability moment” they ought to start by admitting one or two of the countless mistakes in conceiving, “selling”, planning and executing their war of choice in Iraq.

I obviously don’t expect that to happen. And indeed, there’s every reason to believe the President finally acted on Katrina and admitted a mistake only because he was held accountable by the press, cornered by events, and compelled by the outrage of the American people, who with their own eyes could see a failure of leadership and its consequences.

Natural and human calamity stripped away the spin machine, creating a rare accountability moment, not just for the Bush administration, but for all of us to take stock of the direction of our country and do what we can to reverse it. That’s our job—to turn this moment from a frenzied expression of guilt into a national reversal of direction. Some try to minimize the moment by labeling it a “blame game”—but as I’ve said - this is no game and what is at stake is much larger than the incompetent and negligent response to Katrina.

This is about the broader pattern of incompetence and negligence that Katrina exposed, and beyond that, a truly systemic effort to distort and disable the people’s government, and devote it to the interests of the privileged and the powerful. It is about the betrayal of trust and abuse of power. And in all the often horrible and sometimes ennobling sights and sounds we’ve all witnessed over the last two weeks, there’s another sound just under the surface: the steady clucking of Administration chickens coming home to roost.

We wouldn’t be hearing that sound if the people in Washington running our government had cared to listen in the past.

They didn’t listen to the Army Corps of Engineers when they insisted the levees be reinforced.

They didn’t listen to the countless experts who warned this exact disaster scenario would happen.

They didn’t listen to years of urgent pleading by Louisianans about the consequences of wetlands erosion in the region, which exposed New Orleans and surrounding parishes to ever-greater wind damage and flooding in a hurricane.

They didn’t listen when a disaster simulation just last year showed that hundreds of thousands of people would be trapped and have no way to evacuate New Orleans.

They didn’t listen to those of us who have long argued that our insane dependence on oil as our principle energy source, and our refusal to invest in more efficient engines, left us one big supply disruption away from skyrocketing gas prices that would ravage family pocketbooks, stall our economy, bankrupt airlines, and leave us even more dependent on foreign countries with deep pockets of petroleum.

They didn’t listen when Katrina approached the Gulf and every newspaper in America warned this could be “The Big One” that Louisianans had long dreaded. They didn’t even abandon their vacations.

And the rush now to camouflage their misjudgments and inaction with money doesn’t mean they are suddenly listening. It’s still politics as usual. The plan they’re designing for the Gulf Coast turns the region into a vast laboratory for right wing ideological experiments. They’re already talking about private school vouchers, abandonment of environmental regulations, abolition of wage standards, subsidies for big industries - and believe it or not yet another big round of tax cuts for the wealthiest among us!

The administration is recycling all their failed policies and shipping them to Louisiana. After four years of ideological excess, these Washington Republicans have a bad hangover—and they can’t think of anything to offer the Gulf Coast but the hair of the dog that bit them.

And amazingly—or perhaps not given who we’re dealing with—this massive reconstruction project will be overseen not by a team of experienced city planners or developers, but according to the New York Times, by the Chief of Politics in the White House and Republican Party, none other than Karl Rove—barring of course that he is indicted for “outing” an undercover CIA intelligence officer.

Katrina is a symbol of all this administration does and doesn’t do. Michael Brown—or Brownie as the President so famously thanked him for doing a heck of a job - Brownie is to Katrina what Paul Bremer is to peace in Iraq; what George Tenet is to slam dunk intelligence; what Paul Wolfowitz is to parades paved with flowers in Baghdad; what Dick Cheney is to visionary energy policy; what Donald Rumsfeld is to basic war planning; what Tom Delay is to ethics; and what George Bush is to “Mission Accomplished” and “Wanted Dead or Alive.” The bottom line is simple: The “we’ll do whatever it takes” administration doesn’t have what it takes to get the job done.

This is the Katrina administration.

It has consistently squandered time, tax dollars, political capital, and even risked American lives on sideshow adventures: A war of choice in Iraq against someone who had nothing to do with 9/11; a full scale presidential assault on Social Security when everyone knows the real crisis is in health care - Medicare and Medicaid. And that’s before you get to willful denial on global warming; avoidance on competitiveness; complicity in the loss and refusal of health care to millions.

Americans can and will help compensate for government’s incompetence with millions of acts of individual enterprise and charity, as Katrina has shown. But that’s not enough. We must ask tough questions: Will this generosity and compassion last in the absence of strong leadership? Will this Administration only ask for sacrifice in a time of crisis? Has dishonesty in politics degraded our national character to the point that we feel our dues have been paid as citizens with a one-time donation to the Red Cross?

Today, let’s you and I acknowledge what’s really going on in this country. The truth is that this week, as a result of Katrina, many children languishing in shelters are getting vaccinations for the first time. Thousands of adults are seeing a doctor after going without a check-up for years. Illnesses lingering long before Katrina will be treated by a healthcare system that just weeks ago was indifferent, and will soon be indifferent again.

For the rest of the year this nation silently tolerates the injustice of 11 million children and over 30 million adults in desperate need of healthcare. We tolerate a chasm of race and class some would rather pretend does not exist. And ironically, right in the middle of this crisis the Administration quietly admitted that since they took office, six million of our fellow citizens have fallen into poverty. That’s over ten times the evacuated population of New Orleans. Their plight is no less tragic - no less worthy of our compassion and attention. We must demand something simple and humane: healthcare for all those in need - in all years at all times.

This is the real test of Katrina. Will we be satisfied to only do the immediate: care for the victims and rebuild the city? Or will we be inspired to tackle the incompetence that left us so unprepared, and the societal injustice that left so many of the least fortunate waiting and praying on those rooftops?

That’s the unmet challenge we have to face together. Katrina is the background of a new picture we must paint of America. For five years our nation’s leaders have painted a picture of America where ignoring the poor has no consequences; no nations are catching up to us; and no pensions are destroyed. Every criticism is rendered unpatriotic. And if you say “War on Terror” enough times, Katrina never happens.

Well, Katrina did happen, and it washed away that coat of paint and revealed the true canvas of America with all its imperfections. Now, we must stop this Administration from again whitewashing the true state of our challenges. We have to paint our own picture - an honest picture with all the optimism we deserve - one that gives people a vision where no one is excluded or ignored. Where leaders are honest about the challenges we face as a nation, and never reserve compassion only for disasters.

Rarely has there been a moment more urgent for Americans to step up and define ourselves again. On the line is a fundamental choice. A choice between a view that says “you’re on your own,” “go it alone,” or “every man for himself.” Or a different view - a different philosophy - a different conviction of governance - a belief that says our great American challenge is one of shared endeavor and shared sacrifice.

Over the next weeks I will address some of these choices in detail - choices about national security, the war in Iraq, making our nation more competitive and committing to energy independence. But it boils down to this. I still believe America’s destiny is to become a living testament to what free human beings can accomplish by acting in unity. That’s easy to dismiss by those who seem to have forgotten we can do more together than just waging war.

But for those who still believe in the great tradition of Americans doing great things together, it’s time we started acting like it. We can never compete with the go-it- alone crowd in appeals to selfishness. We can’t afford to be pale imitations of the other side in playing the “what’s in it for me” game. Instead, it’s time we put our appeals where our hearts are - asking the American people to make our country as strong, prosperous, and big-hearted as we know we can be - every day. It’s time we framed every question - every issue—not in terms of what’s in it for “me,” but what’s in it for all of us?

And when you ask that simple question - what’s in it for all of us? - the direction not taken in America could not be more clear or compelling.

Instead of allowing a few oil companies to drill their way to windfall profits, it means an America that understands we can’t drill our way to energy independence, we have to invent our way there together.

Instead of making a mockery of the words No Child Left Behind when China and India are graduating tens of thousands more engineers and PhDs than we are, it means an America where college education is affordable and accessible for every child willing to work for it.

Instead of tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, it means an America that makes smart investments in your future like funding the science and research and development that will assure American technological leadership.

Instead of allowing lobbyists to rewrite our environmental laws, it means an America where lakes and rivers and streams are clean enough that when a family takes the kids fishing, it’s actually safe to eat the fish they catch.

Instead of letting a few ideologues get in the way of progress that can make us a stronger and healthier society, it means an America where the biology students here today will do the groundbreaking stem cell research tomorrow.

And instead of stubbornly disregarding intelligence, using force prematurely and shoving our allies aside, it means an America that restores its leadership in the world. An America that meets its responsibility of creating a world where the plagues of our time and future times - from terror to disease to poverty to weapons of mass destruction to the unknown - are overcome by allies united in common cause, and proud to follow American leadership.

That is the direction not taken but still open to us in the future if we answer that simple question - “what’s in it for all of us?” It comes down to the fact that the job of government is to prepare for your future - not ignore it. It should prepare to solve problems - not create them.

This Administration and the Republicans who control Congress give in to special interests and rob future generations. Real leadership stands up to special interests and sets the course for future generations. And the fact is we do face serious challenges as a nation, and if we don’t address them now, we handicap your future. My generation risks failing its obligation of assuring you inherit a safer, stronger America. To turn this around, the greatest challenges must be the starting point. I hope Katrina gives us the courage to face them and the sense of urgency to beat them.

That’s why the next few months are such a critical time. You’ll read about the Katrina investigations and fact-finding missions. You’ll get constant updates on the progress rebuilding New Orleans and new funding for FEMA. Washington becomes a very efficient town once voters start paying attention.

But we can’t let political maneuvering around the current crisis distract people from the gathering, hidden crises - like energy, environment, poverty, healthcare and innovation - that present the greatest threats to our nation’s competitiveness and character. The effort to rebuild New Orleans cannot obscure the need to also rebuild our country.

So realistically, I’m sure you’re wondering: How do I change all this? What can I do? The answer is simple: you have to make your issues the voting issues of this nation. You’re not the first generation to face this challenge.

I remember when you couldn’t even mention environmental issues without a snicker. But then in the 70’s people got tired of seeing the Cuyahoga River catch on fire from all the chemicals. So one day millions of Americans marched. Politicians had no choice but to take notice. Twelve Congressmen were dubbed the Dirty Dozen, and soon after seven were kicked out of office. The floodgates were opened. We got the Clean Air Act, The Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water. We created the EPA. The quality of life improved because concerned citizens made their issues matter in elections.

You are citizens in the greatest democracy in the world. Moments like Katrina are so difficult - so painful - but they help you define your service to your fellow citizens. I’ll never forget as a teenager standing in a field in October of 1957 watching the first man made spacecraft streak across the night sky. The conquest, of course, was Soviet - and while not everyone got to see the unmanned craft pass overhead at 18,000 miles per hour that night - before long every American knew the name Sputnik. We knew we had been caught unprepared.

In the uncertain years thereafter, President Kennedy challenged Americans to act on that instinct. He said, “This is a great country, but I think it could be a greater country...the question we have to decide as Americans,” he said, is “are we doing enough today?”

Today, every American knows the name Katrina—and once again we know our government was undeniably unprepared, even as Americans have shown their willingness to sacrifice to make up for it.

But in these uncertain weeks of Katrina’s aftermath, we must ask ourselves not just whether a great country can be made greater—the sacrifice and generosity of Americans these last weeks answered that question with a resounding yes.

No, our challenge is greater - it’s to speak out so loudly that Washington has no choice but to make choices worthy of this great country - choices worthy of the sacrifice of our neighbors in the Gulf Coast and our troops all around the world.

What’s in it for all of us? Nothing less than the character of our country - and your future.

Monday, September 12, 2005

Cascadia Rising

Can’t you just feel it sometimes?

The angst, the schadenfreude, the hubris.
Rotting from the core, oblivious to what they don’t want to hear, the center cannot hold it all together.
The steady drumbeat of stories chronicling the slow crumbling and dissolution of the Imperial ‘Murcan Empire?

Endless “spin” to counter truth, rampant cronyism, unprecedented corruption, incompetance beyond belief, religious doctrine foisted off as policy. Lies, lies, and more lies and a press that, until recently, was so cowed by the administration that they wouldn’t (or weren’t permitted to) ask the uncomfortable questions that need to be asked.

A “loyal opposition” that has been more loyal than opposition. The Democrats have played possum ever since 9/11. Four years on, they are threatening to actually grow a spine someday. I’ll believe it when I see it.

Why do I continue to have hope in the face of evil deeds and those who abet it? I am not a Pollyanna or prone to “just pretend it’s all OK”, as a recent satirical bumpersticker put it. It’s because of my feeling - and it’s difficult to find hope in facing certain disaster - that we’re seeing the beginning of the end for Bush and his cronies, and their repugnant corporatist ideology. At least for some parts of the U.S.

But first, there will be more of the same ol’, same ol’ - more natural disasters driven by global warming, more denial of humankind’s effects on the environment, more wars over natural resources, more ugly ideology-driven politics, more gutting of any regulation of pollution and corporate malfeasance, even more massive budget deficits and more clamping down on Constitutional rights.

Business as usual cannot go on much longer. Another few years of these policies will end in a global war or a depression worse than the one 75 years ago. The Earth itself can’t take much more. It’s letting us know in increasingly unsubtle ways. What gives me hope is that the long-term effects of these policies upon the U.S. are starting to perhaps break the back of Bush’s support or more likely, the “Blue States” will finally secede from the increasingly fascist American Empire.

Why do I think this? The first signs are already at hand - Oregon, Washington and California and the states of the Northeast are taking matters of energy, global warming and pollution into our own hands, because the Feds will not. The Bush regime is instead trying to make things worse - aiding and abetting their friends in the oil and automobile industries, and trying to strike down state laws on pollution and fuel economy.

We who live in these states consider this one more madness, compounded on all the others. In the ongoing “Reign of Error” the Bush regime has once again made not only the wrong choice, but the worst possible choice out of all available options.

There’s already a lot of resentment in many of these states about the constant religion-based and ideology-driven attempts to roll back state laws on things like assisted suicide, medical marijuana, women’s rights, reproductive rights and gender rights. It won’t take many more such meddlings in state’s affairs before you start seeing serious talk of secession in the mainstream media. Of course, something like the Federal government reneging on Social Security, which Bush hinted about in April, probably would be enough, too.

The Republican Party’s use of “wedge issues” for the last 30 years has succeeded in splitting the Union along ideological grounds. The “culture wars” are increasingly between the Red and Blue states, and will probably end in a breakup that hopefully won’t take the form of a civil war, only because the rest of the U.S, will be too consumed with the latest crisis du jour.

I’m thinking something along the lines of the breakup of the Soviet Union. We have reached the point - like the Soviets - where there is no longer enough “social glue” to hold together a country that is increasingly polarized and too big to effectively govern. We have a president who is actively dividing people rather than uniting and has little interest in governance, planning or followthrough. We have less and less in common with other regions, and have become 2 or 3 or more distinct societies. And so, it will likely break asunder, although it may take a generation to do so.

The loss of the West Coast and Northeast will cut off most of the financial base of the American war machine. Check out the balance of payments between individual states and the Feds in regards to both taxes and benefits. The blue states pay much more in, on average, than they get back. Without that cash flow, the red states will be unable to bully the Middle East, or much of anywhere else for that matter.

I, for one, will welcome the end of the ability of the U.S. to throw its massive resources behind Bush’s latest brainfart. And an independent Cascadia or Pacifica will be able to move beyond the dead-end petroleum-based economy much faster without the hindrance of the U.S. government forbidding us to act.

So what do you do, individually? How can one person stand against vast machines of greed, death and destruction?

Watch water and how it behaves. It is soft as silk, but infinitely persistant. Even the hardest rock cannot stand against it, not in the long run.

Do likewise. Be gentle, but persist. Live your life well, but with the Earth in mind. You are as much a part of it as it is of you.

Grow. Nurture. Feel. Plant seeds, talk to friends and family, sing songs. Drive less, read more.

Take control of your life - individually, neighborhood, city, state and region-wide. Eat local food, patronize local businesses. Disengage from the Great American Death Machine a little more every day. Encourage your local and state governments to do the same. Turn off the TV, take a walk in the sun, or among the falling leaves and rain. And while you’re at it, look for the silver lining and await the coming of spring.

Cascadia has always been here, it’s just waiting for us to realize it.

- Bob Woods

Sunday, September 11, 2005

America's Battered Wife Syndrome

by Gail Thomas

Dear America,
As a friend of the family I can’t sit back and watch you do this to yourself without saying something. Consider this a long distance intervention.

Your man is no good. He treats you like crap, lies to you, abuses you, bullies you, exploits you, takes your money. As a friend I want to tell you that you deserve better. You deserve a person that treats you with respect, cares about your welfare, and your children’s welfare, but that’s not George and it never will be.

Do you tell yourself that he’ll stop, or that it won’t get worse? He won’t ever stop, every insult, injury and death he has caused are a line that once crossed will never be uncrossed. Forget the dream. You will never have the American dream with George. You have to forget about what might have been, what George might have been, and realise that at the end of the day you are what you do, and look at George’s track record.

Notice how he’s alienated all your friends? Who can blame them, they can’t understand why you stay with him when he treats you like shit and embarrasses you in front of everybody. The more his public behaviour overshadows yours, The more doubt creeps over them, they wonder if they knew you as well as they thought they did. You seem to have changed - if you condone his behaviour- and your silence can create the impression that you do. People are more inclined to take things at face value when they feel alienated. Your friends remember the good times you had together, the heroic battles you fought together, all of the intricate interweavings between their families and yours through time and space. Do you even recognise yourself anymore America? He is a drunken, coke-addled loser and he always will be, you should kick him out of your house today before he can destroy any more members of your family, your history, your culture, before he decimates your bank account so irretrievably that China and Saudi Arabia repossess all your stuff.

YOU CAN DO BETTER! You are an amazing country, beautiful, interesting, funny, positively glamorous, you wouldn’t stay single for five minutes, you know that suitors would be competing for your affections and any one of them would be ten times better than George. And how can you stand his god-awful Stepford’s answer to Marie-Antoinette mother, piping up with another casual atrocity every time she opens her mouth.

Because of George and his friends global warming is now upon us - I know what it has cost your family already, combined with George’s complete uselessness and indifference in a crisis. It would probably now be possible for a mathematician to calculate exactly how much of all of our futures we are losing for every minute you stay with that sick, twisted, idiot.

I see you doing what everyone in your position does - you end up looking to the perpetrator for comfort because theres no one else left, and look at how he reacts for Christ’s sake, look at what he did to New Orleans, and you should know that yet again he did it in front of all of your friends, all of us saw nothing happening whilst thousands died, all of us heard Ray Negen and the president of Jefferson Parish (I must heard him 30+ times now and I still cry every time) and all of us heard George’s bloody mother. We have been trying to help and he won’t let us. We are all appalled and aghast, it breaks our hearts to see him hurting you like this, and you not fighting back, you just take it and take it as it slowly spirals down into the pits of hell. What will it take America, will you let him kill you before you’ll kick him out? This is not rhetoric America, he is killing you every day you stay with him. If I had described your relationship with George to you back when you were still with Bill you never would have believed me. He degrades you in little increments, every day he erodes your assets as well as your dignity, your reputation, your legacy and your life America.

All of our TV crews were rescuing survivors as they filmed the devastation because there was nobody else there to help them, all of us saw the victims being treated like some sudden new insurgency. with suspicion and hostility. Those poor people, the heart & soul of New Orleans, the very people whose culture and history made New Orleans beloved around the world, He just left your brothers and sisters to die. Can you really continue in your relationship with George after this? There is a degree at which cognitive dissonance becomes outright delusion. He is a maniac, he is destroying your life, please, please leave him, just leave him, only you have the power to make it stop.

He is selling out your family business, if you let him continue like this how are you going to live? How are you going to feed your children, what happens if you get ill? Everything he has ever touched has turned to shit, he puts any idiot that’ll kiss his ass into positions of power and New Orleans is the result. Kick him out America! Do it today! I know it feels like you would be leaping into a void, but I promise you, you will be leaping out of one. Your friends will come back as soon as they see you are back to your old self, they really miss you. I know that less than 36% of your heart is still in it. Go with the 67% of you, that 36% is just that vestigial, primitive part of the brain that clings to the familiar no matter how badly the familiar sucks.

It all comes down to you, America. I know no-one likes other people passing comment on their relationships but this is an extreme situation. You are in very real danger, he is hurting you everyday and he is hurting us, your friends as well. But only you can make it stop. We are all rooting for you, although we don’t get to talk to you very often anymore, because he cuts us off from you. We are on your side, we will all be over the moon the day you finally kick him out. You know he really should be thrown in jail for the things he has done to you. Him and all of his gangster friends.

Please, please, do it America, you know I am right. If not for yourself then do it for your brothers and sisters and children. Do it before he kills any more of your family or anyone else’s. We are all really worried for your welfare.

Your friend,
Gail

Gail Thomas is am a British/ Australian dual national living in Sydney with her American partner. Her website is http://www.12thharmonic.com

Saturday, September 10, 2005

A Polluter's Feast

Bush has reversed more environmental progress in the past eight months than Reagan did in a full eight years
By Tim Dickenson
RollingStone.com

What can you say about the environmental record of an administration that seeks to test pesticides on poor children and pregnant women? That argues in court that a dam is part of a salmon’s natural environment? That places a timber lobbyist in charge of the national forests and an oil lobbyist in charge of government reports on global warming? That cuts clean-air inspections at oil refineries in half, allows Superfund to go bankrupt and permits the mining industry to pump toxic waste directly into a wild Alaskan lake?

Only this: It’s about to get even worse.

Since President Bush was sworn in for a second term, he has not only continued his unprecedented assault on the environment—he’s intensified it. In recent months, the administration has opened up millions of acres of pristine land to developers, allowing them to log and mine without leaving behind “viable populations” of wildlife. It allowed the import of methyl bromide, a cancer-causing pesticide that was due to be banned this year under an international accord signed by Ronald Reagan, and it scrapped plans to regulate lead paint in home-renovation projects, placing millions of children at risk for brain damage. And on August 8th, taking advantage of solid Republican majorities in both houses of Congress, Bush signed into law his long-stalled energy bill, a grab bag of industry favors that provides $10 billion in oil, gas and coal subsidies while exempting Halliburton and other polluters from environmental laws. The measure approves oil exploration in marine sanctuaries, greenlights drilling on millions of acres of public land in the Rocky Mountains and Alaska, fast-tracks sixteen new coal-fired power plants and provides cradle-to-grave subsidies for new nuclear reactors. In a grotesque fit of petro-nuclear synergy, the bill even funds research into refining oil—using atomic radiation.

The administration’s aim is to roll back four decades of environmental progress—to an era before the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Clean Water Act of 1972, the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. “These laws were all started under President Nixon,” notes Sen. Lincoln Chafee, a Republican from Rhode Island. “The environment has always been something that Republicans have been proud of—but this administration sees it differently.” Others put it even more bluntly. “In the eyes of this administration,” says Marty Hayden, legislative director of Earthjustice, the legal arm of the Sierra Club, “Ronald Reagan was an environmental extremist.”

Indeed, Bush has undone more environmental progress in the last eight months than Reagan dreamed of in his full eight years in office. “Their goal is to take us back to where we were in the Eisenhower administration,” says Buck Parker, Earthjustice’s executive director. “Back to a time when the energy industry had free rein, citizens had no input and there were no environmental laws to be enforced.”

A review of the damage already done in the second term reveals that the Bush administration has gutted environmental protections across the country, from Alaskan rain forests to the Gulf of Mexico:

Fouling The Air - Nowhere is the administration’s contempt for the environment more evident than in its about-face on mercury, a potent neurotoxin that causes brain damage in as many as 600,000 children a year. The Clinton administration, declaring the pollution a “threat to public health,” ordered coal plants to slash their mercury emissions by ninety percent by 2008. But in March, the EPA implemented a new rule—entire sections of which were drafted by industry lobbyists—that allows three times the emission of the Clinton rule and delays implementation of the cleanup until 2030. “I don’t think what the EPA is doing is pro-business,” says Attorney General Peter Harvey of New Jersey, one of thirteen states suing to overturn the rule. “I think it’s anti-humanity.”

Drilling The West - The administration is approving so many new permits for oil and gas drilling—more than 6,000 last year alone - that it can hardly keep pace with the paperwork. In February, the Bureau of Land Management brought aboard five “volunteer” consultants—whose salaries are paid in full by industry—to help with the rubber stamping. “What’s next?” asks Johanna Wald, director of land programs for the National Resources Defense Council. “Hiring poachers as park rangers?” The energy bill goes even further, allowing federal authorities to open public lands to drilling without even considering alternative uses such as hunting and ecotourism. “You are supposed to find the best use of the land,” says Kevin Curtis, vice president of the National Environmental Trust. “But the energy bill basically says, by statute, that oil and gas drilling is the best use of that land.” As a result, millions of acres are sure to follow the fate of Jonah Field in Wyoming, where energy companies have turned the once-untouched desert into a Mad Max subdivision of drilling platforms, polluted ponds and pipelines. “The Bush policy is drill, drill, drill at all costs,” says Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico. “Those of us who want to protect sensitive ecosystems have no voice in this debate.”

Polluting The Water - Even as oil and gas interests get permission to drill on wild lands, the energy bill exempts most of the industry’s 30,000 annual projects from the Clean Water Act—allowing petrochemical runoff from well pads to bleed into creeks, rivers and aquifers. The bill also exempts one of Halliburton’s most profitable practices from the Safe Drinking Water Act. Called hydraulic fracturing, the technique boosts the yield of oil and natural gas by injecting a toxic stew of benzene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, sodium hydroxide and MTBE into the ground. “Fracing” earns Halliburton $1.5 billion a year—twenty percent of its total energy revenues—but also contaminates groundwater. “The exemption is just a piece of pork for Halliburton,” says Eric Schaeffer, former director of the EPA’s Office of Regulatory Enforcement, who quit in 2002 to protest the administration’s pandering to industry. “It’s astonishing to think that that kind of thing can go unchallenged.”

Logging The Forests - Mark Rey—the former timber lobbyist now in charge of the Forest Service—bragged to a gathering of timber executives last December that the administration would double the amount of logging on public lands in its second term. By May, it had scrapped the Clinton-era regulation known as the “roadless rule,” which placed nearly a third of all national forests off-limits to industry. The Forest Service has already mapped roads into 34 million acres. The logging won’t come cheap: Last year alone, taxpayers spent nearly $49 million to carve roads into the Tongass National Forest in Alaska, the world’s largest intact temperate rain forest. In return, the federal treasury collected less than $800,000 in royalties from industry.

Killing The Fish - The energy bill lifts a twenty-five-year moratorium on oil exploration off the East Coast, allowing industry to conduct a new “inventory” of oil and gas reserves—a maritime version of shock and awe that will pummel the ocean floor with massive acoustic waves and disrupt marine sanctuaries. Bush has also proposed turning 3,500 idle oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico into offshore fish farms to offset losses in traditional fishing—a move that will actually increase the agricultural pollution that’s responsible for the decline in fishing in the first place.

Nuking The Future - In June, Bush became the first president to visit a nuclear plant since 1979, when Jimmy Carter toured Three Mile Island after America’s worst atomic accident. “It is time for this country to start building nuclear power plants again,” Bush declared, lauding nuclear power as “environmentally friendly” and “one of America’s safest sources of energy.” To spur construction, the energy bill grants up to $6 billion in tax credits to new nuclear plants—subsidies traditionally reserved for windmills and other green energy sources. The bill will also reimburse power companies up to $2 billion if their nuclear projects are delayed by citizen opposition and force taxpayers to foot the bill for any American Chernobyls. “We’re going back to the 1950s—nuclear power is good for you,” says Curtis of the National Environmental Trust. “But if it’s such a great source of energy, then why do they have to do so much to remove all the risks for industry?”
One thing’s for certain: there are more rollbacks to come. The energy bill cleared the Senate only after the administration dropped its most controversial provision: opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling. But even before Bush had signed the measure, Sen. Pete Domenici, chair of the Senate Energy Committee, vowed to resurrect the drilling plan in September by tacking it onto the budget bill, which is immune to filibuster. That would effectively lower the number of votes required for Senate passage from sixty to fifty. “We’re going to fight it like hell,” says Curtis, “but there just aren’t fifty-one votes.”

The legislature isn’t the only branch going along with Bush’s environmental assault. Because most of the administration’s rollbacks take place behind the scenes, in a series of bureaucratic nips and tucks to existing rules, they are subject to challenge in federal court. But thanks to Bush’s effort to stack the bench with anti-regulatory ideologues, the judiciary isn’t proving to be much of an obstacle. In July, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the EPA’s decision not to regulate carbon-dioxide emissions. And in August, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, one of the reactionary justices confirmed as part of the Senate deal that defused the “nuclear option,” refused to block implementation of Bush’s mercury rule.

Public outrage has forced the administration to give up a few of its wildest schemes: “blending” raw sewage into drinking water, for example, or exempting 20 million acres of wetlands from the Clean Water Act. But most of Bush’s efforts to gut the nation’s environmental protections are so incremental, they go unnoticed by the public—even when they have far-reaching consequences. In August, the Forest Service quietly adjusted the numbers it uses to weigh the benefits of logging vs. tourism, slashing the “recreational value” of the forests by $100 billion. The EPA went a step further: Under its old cost-benefit formula, the agency valued each human life saved from toxic pollution at $6.1 million. But thanks to a new rule, the cost of polluting people to death has plummeted: Under Bush, your life has officially been devalued by $2.4 million.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >